• Menu

    What’s it going to be then, eh?

    The International Anthony Burgess Foundation
    About Anthony Burgess
    • Introducing Anthony Burgess
    • The Books of Anthony Burgess
    • The Music of Anthony Burgess
    Discover More
    • A Clockwork Orange
    • Earthly Powers
    • Anthony Burgess and Shakespeare
    • Dystopian Fiction
    About The Foundation
    • Our Mission
    • Visiting Us
    • The Burgess Bar
    • Support the Burgess Foundation
    • Join our mailing list
    • Contact us
    Anthony Burgess Archive
    • About the Archive
    • Visiting the Archive
    • Object of the Week
    • Contact the Archivist
    What's On
    • News and Blogs
    • Event listings
    • Venue hire
    • Burgess Prize
    • Exhibitions
    • Podcasts
    The International Anthony Burgess Foundation
  • What’s it going to be then, eh?

    OPENING TIMES
    Bar Open for events
    Reading Room Available for pre-booked appointments 10.00am - 3.00pm weekdays
    Office Hours By appointment: info@anthonyburgess.org
    HOW TO FIND US
    Engine House
    Chorlton Mill
    3 Cambridge Street
    Manchester
    M1 5BY
    Nearest train station Oxford Road More information
    Next event
    Talks: The Sex Lectures Sat 28 Jan 2023 7:00 pm £14.50 More information
  • The International Anthony Burgess Foundation
  • What's it going to be then, eh?

    Exhibitions. New writing. Concert commissions. Academic research. Public events, in venues and online. And at the core of everything, preserving and promoting our extensive Anthony Burgess archive.

    Your donation to the Burgess Foundation supports our mission to promote the life and work of Anthony Burgess in so many ways.

  • What’s it going to be then, eh?

The International Anthony Burgess Foundation The International Anthony Burgess Foundation
NEWS AND BLOG POSTS

Clever-clever: Critiquing Anthony Burgess’s Shakespeare biography

  • Will Carr

  • 25th August 2020
  • category

  • Blog Posts
  • tagged as

  • Enderby's Dark Lady
  • Nothing Like The Sun
  • Obscenity and the Arts
  • Shakespeare

Hunting, hawking, animal baiting and football

Anthony Burgess’s Shakespeare was published in 1970 by Jonathan Cape as a lavishly illustrated folio (see above). Burgess described his biography as a mode of using up the research he had done for a film about Shakespeare’s life that he had written for Warner Brothers, a project apparently mired in development problems and unlikely to be realised.

The book itself emerged as something more than that: a vigorous, colourful and extravagant, even fanciful portrait of Shakespeare’s life and times, balanced by sharp observations about Shakespeare’s plays.

In the second volume of his memoirs, Burgess is a little dismissive of the finished biography, noting that he ‘understood that the true Shakespeare scholars of Princeton thought little of the text, but that was to be expected’. However, he clearly paid attention to the opinions of its reviewers.

Burgess inspecting a manuscriptWhile some American publications were quite positive about the book, Burgess notes that ‘disparagement came from my native country,’ and he quotes several negative reviews from the British press. As he writes in You’ve Had Your Time:

The Tablet, for instance, found ‘the captions … coy, clever-clever, or muddled. Plain factuality would have helped matters. Burgess plainly does not know the religion of Shakespeare’s home and district, and his groundless attack on Shakespeare’s wife leads you to think that the biographer had known and hated her most of his life. One gets a strong feeling that Burgess had little heart for the work.’ Unjust.

The Economist said: ‘His scholarship is defective, and the chronological order of the plays is either based on outmoded, or crankily hypothetical theories. The literary opinions are wilfully odd and coarse; they suggest that Burgess is carelessly writing down for an ignorant public.’

It is not clear why Burgess sets out these criticisms so carefully and accurately, and with so little complaint, apart from finding the imputation of a lack of sincerity ‘unjust’. There can be no doubt, of course, that he was devoted to Shakespeare throughout his writing life.

The point about Burgess’s ‘groundless attack’ on Ann Hathaway was developed in 2007 by Germaine Greer in her own biographical book, Shakespeare’s Wife. Greer’s polemical account of Ann Hathaway’s life seeks to counter the traditional portrayal of her by male critics as having been a brake on Shakespeare’s creativity.

Shakespeare by Anthony Burgess

The Shakespeare marriage has been portrayed negatively in many accounts, with attention given to the age difference between him and Ann, their abrupt wedding, Shakespeare’s long absences from his wife and family in London, and his formal bequest to ‘my wife’ of ‘the second-best bed’. These facts have often been combined to conclude that Shakespeare’s marriage was unhappy, or at the very least detached and transactional. Greer’s approach is to reassess what is known about Ann Hathaway and to present an alternative view.

One of her targets turns out to be Burgess, one of whose conjectures in his Shakespeare biography is that Shakespeare ended up marrying the wrong woman. Here is Burgess:

It is reasonable to believe that Will wished to marry a girl called Ann Whateley … Sent on skin-buying errands to Temple Grafton, Will could have fallen for a comely daughter, sweet as May and shy as a fawn. He was eighteen and highly susceptible. Knowing something about girls he would know that this was the real thing. Something, perhaps, quite different from what he felt about Mistress Hathaway of Shottery.

It is reasonable to believe that Will wished to marry a girl called Ann Whateley... He was eighteen and highly susceptible.

Greer points out that Burgess has entirely invented the beauty and temperament of Ann Whateley, about whom nothing is known, and characterising the older Ann Hathaway as ‘Mistress’ is rhetoric designed to present her as ‘forbidding, spinsterish, schoolmarmy even.’

She goes on to show that Burgess stigmatises Ann Hathaway as promiscuous, rather than ‘chaste, not wanton and forward’ like Anne Whateley; and points out his invention of Shakespeare’s feelings, again not recorded, as he marries: ‘Will gave in, with bitter resignation, and was led to the slaughter, or the marriage bed.’

Greer’s critique of Burgess is part of a wider project in her book to point out the failings of mainstream, and male, approaches to Shakespeare’s biography, and — misogynistic tropes notwithstanding — Burgess is unlucky in this respect to be singled out. He makes no claims for the accuracy of his historical research, and indeed he takes pains, throughout the text of Shakespeare, to draw attention to the speculative nature of many of his statements. More than once he describes his ideas as ‘very unsound’, invites us to ignore what he is saying, and even introduces overt literary techniques to his telling of Shakespeare’s story, such as when he begins a particularly extravagant passage of description: ‘This is the moment for the traditional florid cadenza to mark Will’s first glimpse of London. Very well, then.’

Given this, it may be profitable to place Burgess’s Shakespeare biography in the context of his other, creative work about Shakespeare, especially the novels Nothing Like The Sun and Enderby’s Dark Lady, where Shakespeare appears not only as a fictional character, but as a way of thinking about the nature of fiction and biography.

Germaine Greer has made a more recent engagement with Burgess’s work in her fascinating essay ‘Dirty Books & Laughing Stocks’, published in 2018, alongside Burgess’s lecture given in Malta on the evils of censorship, ‘Obscenity and the Arts’. She places Burgess’s writing in the context of the 1970s’ counterculture and the very real threats to artistic and creative expression, both in Malta and in Britain. The limitations of his approach are once again provocatively exposed. Sadly, there is no record of Anthony Burgess and Germaine Greer ever having met.


Friends, Romans and countrymen, lend us your browsing history for: Burgess and Shakespeare A brand new online exhibition

  • Share | 
  • Print
Related Blog posts
Inside the archive: Preserving Debussy Anna Edwards
Anthony Burgess and the Theatre: Cyranosing Andrew Biswell
Ninety-Nine Novels: The Once and Future King by T.H. White Graham Foster
Anthony Burgess and the Theatre: The Eve of Saint Venus Will Carr
SEE ALL NEWS AND BLOG POSTS
Go to home page
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Go to home page
Follow us

© 2023 International Anthony Burgess Foundation

Charity no. 1102623

International Anthony Burgess Foundation
Engine House Chorlton Mill 3 Cambridge Street M1 5BY
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Designed by Instruct
  • Built by OH Digital